Ashland-Bayfield League Opposes Mining Bill

In August, the Ashland/Bayfield Counties League of Women Voters adopted a resolution to oppose any new mining legislation in Wisconsin that would change current law and weaken environmental protections, reduce opportunity for citizen comment, or reduce opportunity for legal action.

Testimony on Jan. 11 was given by league member Joyce Kiel to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy, and Small Business at the committee's hearing in Hurley.

The Ashland/Bayfield Counties League of Women Voters is opposed to Assembly Bill 426.

According to Kiel's testimony, the league's stance is a result of the bill's 360-day Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources timeline for considering an iron mining permit and a prohibition placed in the bill on the DNR from considering whether permit application information is based on quality material.

The testimony also shows concern for the bill not giving the DNR authority to monitor an iron mine, inspect an iron mining waste site operating log, issue a stop order if there is a threat to public health or safety, or issue a stop order if there is a threat to the environment.

The bill also allows for wetland destruction, would weaken laws for wetland mitigation, would allow iron mines to be exempt from floodplain and shore land zoning ordinances, and would allow for iron mining waste to be deposited in floodplains and shore land areas under certain circumstances, the testimony reads.

Mining waste could be deposited in areas that would result in violating surface water or groundwater quality standards, groundwater sampling would not necessarily be required, and public and private groundwater supplies would be jeopardized, the league's statement reads.

Kiel also told the committee that the proposed bill eliminates contested case hearings and citizen suits related to iron mining, reduces the number of public hearings required during the permit process, eliminates a requirement to give public notice if an iron mining law exemption is requested, and eliminates public hearings related to requested exemptions.

“In summary, because Assembly Bill 426 both weakens environmental protections and reduces the opportunities for citizen comment and legal redress, the Ashland/Bayfield Counties League of Women Voters opposes the bill,” Kiel writes. “We ask that the Committee not recommend its passage.”

The League of Women Voters is

The League of Women Voters is made up of men and women. They are not partisan, but they are political. They don't come by their decisions lightly. They research, they discuss, and not they have spoken.

read before you comment

You have obviously NOT read the proposed legislation if you believe it will not change protections to the environment.

Women nurture. It's

Women nurture. It's instinctual. That in and of itself should explain the League's stand on this issue. If you cannot understand that, you do not understand women.

"The bill does nothing to harm water quality." Literally, Guest (not verified) | January 22, 2012 - 8:47am, you are 100% correct. The bill doesn't live or breathe; therefore, it cannot DO anything. However, greedy, irresponsible mining companies can use this proposed bill to literally get away with murder by polluting our water (and air) just like they've been doing in the operational taconite mines/processing plants in Minnesota and Michigan. WAKE UP!!!!!!!!

Sarah Martines
Ashland

Political neutrality goes out

Political neutrality goes out the window when you are threatening the public's health and water supply. Someday, hopefully, everyone will get that. There are hundreds of people that will lay down in the path of mining equipment before the Penokee's ever get turned upside down.

charlie ortman

mining

Dear Guest (not verified) | January 22, 2012 - 8:47am
You said; (( "There is no delicate balance in nature; this is a myth. Nature simply adjusts to changes without prejudice; there is no preferred condition which can be described as “good” or a condition which can be described as “bad”. This are purely subjective human terms based on that which we prefer.
The bill does nothing to harm water quality, it makes the permitting process more manageable. The bill is about politics, permits, processes and payments; and it is about facilitating needed economic development in an area with a growing poverty rate thanks, in part, to over-regulation based on imaginary environmental issues, created out of thin air."))
You obviously have no idea how wetlands cleanup water. Explain to me what a superfund cleanup site is. Perhaps that is a subjective decision by humans of what they prefer in their environment, but its because poison is hard to live with if you are a human. This whole mining debacle including your side is based on human subjectivity. The problem is that you are telling big fat lies about it and hoping enough of us in the North are dumb enough to believe you. This bill absolutely harms water quality and you know it because you can read. Unless you are one of those shameless mine promoters that considers Minnesota and Michigan's DNR's and Pollution Control Agencies "radical environmentalists."
Over regulation based on imaginary environmental issues?! Are you kidding me? Is that honestly what you think the genesis of environmental regulation came from? Some folks dreamed up some environmental harm and then convinced whole legislatures to make laws against them?! Jesus what are you smoking?
Good people of the north please ignore the nameless GTAC shills that are constantly trying to convince you of the most preposterous claims. Particularly that mining doesn't harm water quality and that environmental regulations resulted from some nameless entities imagined sleights to the environment by industry. I can show you a few cancer victims that would like to disagree with Guest (not verified) | January 22, 2012 - 8:47am.

Charlie Ortman

There is no delicate balance

There is no delicate balance in nature; this is a myth. Nature simply adjusts to changes without prejudice; there is no preferred condition which can be described as “good” or a condition which can be described as “bad”. This are purely subjective human terms based on that which we prefer.

The bill does nothing to harm water quality, it makes the permitting process more manageable. The bill is about politics, permits, processes and payments; and it is about facilitating needed economic development in an area with a growing poverty rate thanks, in part, to over-regulation based on imaginary environmental issues, created out of thin air.

It should be a clue to you

It should be a clue to you how bad this bill is if a politically neutral body comes out against it. I dont see where they are against mining, just this bill, as are so many!!!

charlie ortman

Although I am opposed to the

Although I am opposed to the mining bill myself, I am outraged that the League would take political stands.
I am calling on everyone to boycott the Ashland/Bayfield Counties League of Women Voters until they become politically neutral again.

Partisanship

Guest, who was apparently afraid to add his or her name, said they felt opposition to the mining bill was partisan. You said "Now they take sides on political issues". The mining bill is not a political issue - it's an environmental issue, and we should ALL be opposed to anything that is very likely to destroy nature's delicate balance!

Mining bill abomination

Chi miigwech (many thanks) to the League of Women voters. You ladies are heroes of the anti-metallic sulfide mining movement.