Assembly Passes Mining Bill

Ads Against Mining Bill Air Throughout State

[UPDATED2] With a 59 to 36 vote Thursday, the state Assembly voted to approve a mining bill that, if approved by the full legislature and signed into law, would make significant changes to the mining laws currently on Wisconsin's books.

The bill passed along a party-line vote.

Rep. Janet Bewley (D-Ashland) stated that she proposed amendments to the bill, which were rejected. One of her amendments would have allowed 100 percent of tax revenue generated from mining operations to go to local municipalities, she said on her Facebook page. The Assembly bill only allows 60 percent of tax proceeds to go to local municipalities. The rest goes to the state's general fund. 

"It was tabled, of course," Bewley stated about her amendment. "Better things can happen in the Senate."

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) said he hopes the state Senate can pass a mining bill before the legislative session ends in mid-March, according to an Associated Press report. "I don't see us leaving town without a mining bill passed out of the state Senate," the Associated Press quotes Fitzgerald as saying. "We've got to hustle."

Republicans have advocated for the bill, stating it would allow Gogebic Taconite, a subsidiary of a Florida-based company, to quickly obtain the necessary permits for developing an iron-ore mine in the Gogebic-Penokee Range. Opponents have said the bill endangers the environment and financially burdens Northern Wisconsin communities.

The bill's passage drew immediate criticism from Clean Wisconsin, an environmental advocacy group.

"Assembly Republicans voted today to roll back commonsense environmental protections, silence the voice of the public, and eliminate accountability for mining corporations," stated Amber Meyer Smith, government relations director at Clean Wisconsin. "Their actions stand in contrast to the will of Wisconsin citizens and jeopardize the health of our families for the profit of out-of-state mining corporations."

On Thursday, the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters unveiled its first statewide television advertising campaign this week in opposition to mining bill AB 426.

The advertisement emphasizes the human health consequences of weakening Wisconsin’s current conservation laws and encourages citizens to contact their Senators to oppose the bill as it now heads to the Senate from the Assembly.

“If given the choice between a clean glass of water to drink or one that is potentially contaminated with arsenic, lead and mercury, I’m going to choose the clean one. But the real point here is that Wisconsinites shouldn’t have to choose. We all have a right to clean, safe drinking water,” said Kerry Schumann, executive director of Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters.

The league says the acts of mining and processing iron from mines before it is shipped can expose local communities to toxic chemicals like arsenic, lead, and mercury.  The organization has compiled online information about mining and its relationship to health threats.

To view the ad, please visit: https://www.thedatabank.com/dpg/273/donate.asp?formid=specdon

This article was updated to include Clean Wisconsin's response to the bill's passage. Update2 includes comments from Bewley and Fitzgerald.

Think about that next time

Think about that next time you get into your car that is made of steel and uses fuel and oils to run. Think about it next time you cook your family a meal in an oven, made of steel (iron ore). Think of it when you look at your wedding ring (gold or silver) or turn your thermostat up on a cold day. Think of it when you use your computer and your cell phone. Think about it when you turn on your lights that run on electricity (coal) that flows through ( copper) wire. Whether you want to believe it or not, mining is all around you. We all pollute every day we get into our vehicles or our boats or on our snowmobiles. We however realize that we need to get to work so we drive. We want to enjoy ourselves with recreation so we drive boats and snowmobiles and 3 wheelers. We also need to understand that mining is not going to go away and that we need it for many of things that we use everyday. The easy thing to do is curl up in a ball and become a N.I.M.B.Y. To say NO to mining is the same as saying NO to our way of life. Lake Wazee is a sore spot for the Radical Environmentalist so they try to downplay it and will undoubtully come up with all kinds of reasons to discount it. It's just like the Flambeau mine. The radicals don't want any mining, period. They live in an unrealistic state of mind where they don't think about the realities of feeding a world that is dependent on the raw materials that come out of the ground. If the Marquette area really is polluted someone should tell all of the people who have been living up there with Iron Ore mining for over 100 years to, GET OUT, while they still can. Yes, oceansdad should run up there and alert the people who have lived in an area that has been making iron ore pellets since 1953 to MOVE AWAY. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, once again, over the top propaganda from the radicals but hey, that's what they do, that's their thing in life.

Once again power, money and

Once again power, money and greed and the people they represent have targeted our state. We are not a wealthy area but we have a clean enviroment to live in and a destination for many who value this. You only need to travel around the United States to see the areas that once were mining booms. Now the poverty is paramount. Churches send people in to do mission work with the people that live there.

sure, they look nice from the outside

this is a response to 'the radical environmentalist' did you know that in 2010 the EPA described the Minnesota mine as having 'unacceptable environmental impacts, especially in regard to water quality'. In Marquette, the mining company admitted that they released 20 tons of pollution into the air EACH YEAR, had 'unexpectedly higher levels of acid drainage', and inadvertantly spread acid dust on roadsides. With a little digging, pardon the pun, you will find that Mining companies frequently underestimate the level of environmental damage they will do. Often times the damage is uncovered after the mine has closed and the companies have abandoned the area. Then local taxpayers are left with the burden of paying for clean-up. You can scowl at environmentalists all you like, but it doesn't change the fact that mines DO pollute the environment and there hasn't been a case yet where a mine has been environmentally safe. The question is, are you willing to risk damage to our ecosystem and health problems for the sake of a few jobs now? Maybe mining was our heritage, but we know so much more now...I hope.

time flies like an arrow...fruit flies like a banana.

The iron mine that became

The iron mine that became Lake Wazee was considerably smaller than what is being proposed for the Penokee Range. The iron taken from Wazee was high quality and worked by people who, for the most part, lived in the area, who raised their children there and are watching their grandchildren enjoy the area now. It was a success.
The iron in the Penokees is going to be much harder to get, not as pure and will impact a much greater area. It is not the same.

Disgusting

This is complete pandering and catering to business with complete disregard for the people that they were elected to represent. It is short sighted, and just wrong. The process is entirely corrupt. Who donated to Walker's campaign? Chris Kline who owner of Kline Group who owns Geogobic Taconite. This recall can not wait.

The radical environmentalist

The radical environmentalist would like us to all believe that this mine will somehow ruin the whole area. Not true. The mines on the Marquette range are less than 10 miles from the shore of Lake Superior. The Marquette area has been rated as one of the top 20 places to live in the United States for outdoor recreation. How can that be? Take a look at Lake Wazee in southern Wisconsin. Lake Wazee is a former "magnetite" iron ore open pit that also had a pelletizing operation. Did the whole area get ruined and did everyone's well go dry. NO. It is now a recreational area with campground, trails, swimming beach and is a diving hot spot due it's depth and water clarity. Water clarity, but I was told this mine will contaminate the water and will leave it unusuable. Untrue. Another example is the Cayuna Mine Pit Lakes in Minnesota. These former open pit mines have become a beautiful chain of lakes that are now used for recreation. Be careful what you subscribe to. Check out those two areas and then see if you still believe that this mine will ruin the northland forever. Oh and one more thing. As far as tourism goes, the Tilden Mine on the Marquette Range brings in thousands of people from all over the world to tour the mine and processing plant. It's time for the people on the range to return to their Heritage, and that's mining.

Madison

To the person who commented that Madison has made a mistake in promoting jobs at any cost. Please know that it's not the citizenry of Madison who want this law to pass or who think this is a good idea...........it's the lawmakers and very few of them represent Madison or are from Madison. Like stated in the story, the votes have passed along party lines. Those of us who live in Madison and escape to the north woods know the real deal.

Among all of the other laws passed in our state with this administration, it's been difficult to know that this law being so swiftly moved thru will dessimate one of the most beautiful parts of our state. No significant public input. They are pandering to "business" so that there can be 'jobs creation'. At what cost? For those who live up north and support the creation of jobs........think what will be left for your kids after they come thru and level the topography and pollute the ground water. Think long term, not just near term. They are going to ruin the north woods.

I would like to thank the

I would like to thank the responsible adults of the assembly who voted to support needed economic development while protecting the environment. Those obstacles to the bill and the project will be removed.

In an act of total partisan

In an act of total partisan cowardice, our own assembly representative voted against the interests of the area. This is totally irresponsible.

Health

I would like to challenge the medical communities of Bad River-Ashland-Washburn-Bayfield-Red Cliff to join together in lodging a formal statement of protest against a mine in the Penokees. As I said today when testifying, mining would create jobs-- but they would be in health care as so many people (and their children) would become sick.
Anyone want to take the challenge?
I think it would be very meaningful. Thanks for considering it... whoever you are, out there!